Up
YUST  /  Press-center  /  Media

Media

RSS

On 1-2 March, a conference on the subject of “Intellectual property – economics and the law” shall take place in Moscow with the participation of the law firm “YUST”

The conference is organized by the company “Infor-media Russia” , a joint venture of the companies “Expomedia Group Plc” and “T&F Informa Group PLC”, who specialize in conducting conferences and organizing professional interaction. The law firm “YUST” is a co-organizer of this conference, and its specialists shall participate in the proceedings.
10.12.2004

In its Resolution of 06.08.2004, the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals upheld the decision of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow of 31.05.2004concerning the refusal of the Inspection of the Ministry of the Russian Federation of Taxes and Collect

The Inspection of the Ministry of the Russian Federation of Taxes and Collections № 29 on Closed Joint-Stock Companies applied to the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow with a request for the declaration of a transaction as invalid – an agreement of 05.08.2002 on the supply of medical equipment, executed between LLC “Aval-2000” (supplier) and LLC Enterprise “BAROST” (buyer).
07.12.2004

The Head of the Intellectual Property Department of the law firm “YUST” took part in the work of a seminar dealing with the problems of “Current issues of the legal protection of industrial property”

The seminar devoted to the problems concerning “Current issues of the legal protection of industrial property” was organized by the Russian State Institute of Intellectual Property and has occurred over the past several years. It is attended by the managers of patent services, patent specialists and patent attorneys.
24.11.2004

The legally acting Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow of 11.08.2004 concerning the Decision of the Inter-Regional Inspection of the Russian Federation on Taxes and Collections from Major Taxpayers (MIMNS) № 2 of 28.1.2003 № 9/48-03

The Inter-Regional Inspection of the Russian Federation on Taxes and Collections from Major Taxpayers № 2 (MIMNS from MT) №2 conducted an assizes session to verify the correct calculation, fullness and timeliness of VAT payment into the state budget by LLC “Gazkomplektimpex” for the period from 01.01.2000 to 31.12.2002.
23.11.2004

In its Resolution of 14 September 2004, the Presidium of the Higher Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation refused to satisfy the claim filed by OJSC “Rosno” concerning the exaction of the sum of 20 390 248 rubles of unjust enrichment acquired by OJ

OJSC “SNP “Nova” filed a claim against OJSC “Rosno” with the Arbitration Court of the Samara Region calling for restitution of an insurance sum and interest for the use of another party’s financial means by the insurance company.
14.11.2004

In its Resolution of 26.10.2004, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dismissed the cassational complaint of OJSC “RZhD”

In its Resolution of 26.10.2004, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dismissed the cassational complaint of OJSC “RZhD”, leaving in force the Resolution of the arbitration court of the appeals instance obliging OJSC “RZhD” to reinstate the entry regarding the presence of the sum of 162 381 243 rubles 60 kopecks on the personal account of OJSC “Troitskaya GRES” in the technological center for processing of documentation (TekhPD).
27.10.2004

On 20 October 2004, the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals confirmed the illegality of yet another decision of the Commission of the Ministry for Antimonopoly Policy of 11 February 2004 on the matter of bringing OJSC “Edinaya torgovaya kompaniya” [Sole Tr

On 20 October 2004, the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals confirmed the illegality of yet another decision of the Commission of the Ministry for Antimonopoly Policy of 11 February 2004 on the matter of bringing OJSC “Edinaya torgovaya kompaniya” [Sole Trading Company] to book on charges of violating antimonopoly legislation.
21.10.2004

On 23 September 2004, the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow ruled on the matter of the claim filed by the company Kolop Stempelerzeugung Skopek GmbH and Co. KG, AT against CJSC “Trodat- S.N.G.”, LLC “Trodat XXI” and LLC “MaxStamp” regarding violatio

On 23 September 2004, the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow ruled on the matter of the claim filed by the company Kolop Stempelerzeugung Skopek GmbH and Co. KG, AT against CJSC “Trodat- S.N.G.”, LLC “Trodat XXI” and LLC “MaxStamp” regarding violation of a patent. The case is of interest in the sphere of protection of intellectual property rights.
15.10.2004

In its Resolution of 14 October 2004, the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals confirmed the illegal nature of the Decision of the Commission of the Ministry for Antimonopoly Policy of 11 February 2004 concerning bringing OJSC “Edinaya torgovaya kompaniya”

At a hearing on 14 October 2004, in which the attorneys of the law firm “YUST” took part, the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals confirmed the illegality of the Decision and Prescription of the Commission of the Ministry for Antimonopoly Policy of 11 February 2004 regarding bringing the company “Edinaya torgovaya kompaniya” to book on charges of violating antimonopoly legislation.
14.10.2004

In a hearing on 09.09.2004, the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow refused to satisfy a claim filed by LLC “Bigeo” demanding that the registration certificate of LLC “Fitolon-Nauka”, issued by the Russian Ministry of Health for the biologically-activ

LLC “Bigeo” applied to the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow with a demand that the court declare invalid the registration certificate issued to LLC “Fitolon-Nauka” by the Russian Ministry of Health for the biologically-active additive “Klamin”. LLC “Fitolon-Nauka” figured in the case as a third party, and its interests were represented by the Law firm “YUST.”
30.09.2004