RUS
 Up
YUST  /  Press-center  /  Media

Media

RSS

Participation of Law Firm “YUST” Partner, A.Kukin, in the seminar “Global and independent law firms in Europe and Russia: Strategy for competition and cooperation.”

On 7 December 2006, a seminar took place in the Legal Information Center of the M.I. Rudomino All-Russian State Library of Foreign Literature in Moscow, on the subject of “Global and independent law firms in Europe and Russia: Strategy for competition and cooperation.” Artem Kukin, a Partner of the Law Firm “YUST”, took part in this seminar.
07.12.2006

The Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow and the resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court that acknowledged as invalid the decision of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax

In its resolution of 06.12.2006, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow of 15.06.2006 and the resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court of 31.08.2006, that acknowledged as invalid the decision of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia № 28 for the City of Moscow of 09.02.2006 № 33, concerning the imposing of tax liability for a tax violation.
07.12.2006

The Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court that revoked the decision of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow and dismissed the application by OJSC “DAR” for a review, due to newly di

In its resolution of 27.11.2006, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court of 14.08.2006 that revoked the decision of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow and dismissed the application by OJSC “DAR” for a review, due to newly discovered circumstances, of an earlier court decision in favor of LLC “KOPEYKA DEVELOPMENT.
30.11.2006

The Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow and the resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court that acknowledged as invalid the decision of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax

In its resolution of 23.11.2006, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow of 31.05.2006 and the resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court of 15.08.2006, that acknowledged as invalid the decision of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia №28 for the City of Moscow of 13.02.2006 № 33, concerning the refusal the imposing of tax liability for a tax violation.
24.11.2006

The Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow and the resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court that acknowledged as invalid the decision of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax

In its resolution of 23.11.2006, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow of 22.05.2006 and the resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court of 14.08.2006, that acknowledged as invalid the decision of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia №28 for the City of Moscow of 08.02.2006 № 31, concerning the refusal to impose tax liability for a tax violation.
23.11.2006

The Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow and the resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court that acknowledged as invalid the decision of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax

In its resolution of 21.11.2006, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit upheld the ruling of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow of 24.05.2006 and the resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court of 14.08.2006, that acknowledged as invalid the decision of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia №28 for the City of Moscow of 07.02.2006 №30, on the refusal to bring to book on tax responsibility for a breach of tax legislation.
22.11.2006

Participation of the advocates and attorneys of the law firm “YUST” in a working meeting with the Head of the Directorate on Legislation of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Legal Studies Dmitri Ivanovich DEDOV.

Advocates and attorneys of the law firm “YUST” took part in a working meeting with the Head of the Directorate on Legislation of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Legal Studies Dmitri Ivanovich DEDOV. This meeting took place under the aegis of the Federal Chamber of Advocates of Russia.
20.11.2006

The Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit revoked the decision of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow and also the ruling of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court, and satisfied the claim field by LLC “Firma Iliev” calling for the acknowle

The Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow Circuit revoked the decision of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow and also the ruling of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court, and satisfied the claim filed by LLC “Firma Iliev” calling for the acknowledgement as invalid the resolution of the Administration Rosnedvizhimost for the City of Moscow, for the calling of the firm to book on administrative charges for unauthorized occupation of a plot of land exceeding an area of 12 hectares.
14.11.2006

Participation of the Partners of the Law firm “YUST” in a business conference in China.

The Chairman of the Council of the Bar Association of the Moscow Region “Law firm “YUST”, Yu.S. Pilpenko, and advocate of the above-mentioned Bar Association A.V. Popov, took part in an international business conference held on 5-10 November 2006 in China (Shanghai, Beijing).
14.11.2006

The Moscow City Court affirmed the legality of the decision of the Presnensky District Court of the City of Moscow that dismissed the claim filed by the District Environmental Prosecutor’s Office for the City of Moscow against the Administration Rostekhna

On 19 October 2006, the Moscow City Court dismissed the cassational presentation of the District Environmental Prosecutor’s Office for the City of Moscow, and affirmed the legality of the decision of the Presnensky District Court of the City of Moscow that dismissed the claim filed by the District Environmental Prosecutor’s Office that called for the acknowledgement as invalid the conclusions of the experts of the state ecological committee on the materials of the project “Construction of a business and commercial center at the address: Pl. Kievskogo vokzala, vl. 1, rayon “Dorogomilovo” of the Central Administrative District of the City of Moscow”, approved by the order of the Administration of Rostekhnadzor for the City of Moscow of 14.02.2006 № 218.
10.11.2006