RUS
 Up
YUST  /  Press-center  /  Media

Media

RSS

The advocate of the Moscow Region Bar Association "Law Firm "YUST" ROKHLIN Arthur Alexandrovich has been awarded the status of a Partner of the Law Firm "YUST" (LLC)

The advocate of the Moscow Region Bar Association "Law Firm "YUST" ROKHLIN Arthur Alexandrovich has been awarded the status of a Partner of the Law Firm "YUST" (LLC).
10.06.2005

On 9 April 2005, the Council of the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation elected the Chairman of the Bar Association of the Moscow Region "Law firm "YUST", Yuri Sergeyevich Pilipenko, to the post of Vice-President of the Chamber

On 9 April 2005, the Council of the Federal Chamber of Advocates of the Russian Federation elected the Chairman of the Bar Association of the Moscow Region "Law firm "YUST", Yuri Sergeyevich Pilipenko, to the post of Vice-President of the Chamber.
19.04.2005

On 28 March 2005, the Intellectual Property Department of the “YUST” law firm was joined by a new specialist in the field, A.A. Sulimov

A.A. Sulimov graduated from the Moscow State Law Academy and was earlier employed by LLC “Nezavisimoye patentnoye agentstvo” [Independent Patent Agency] , and also by the Department for the Protection of Intellectual Property of the Moscow State Institute of Electronics and Mathematics.
15.04.2005

A conference on “Intellectual property: protection of trademarks” took place in Moscow on 1-2 March 2005

Representatives of companies in such spheres as computer programming, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, foodstuffs, perfumery and cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, as well as representatives of bodies of executive, legislative and judicial power, companies offering legal services in the area of intellectual property, took an active part in the conference.
11.04.2005

On 10 March 2005, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District sustained the resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Appeals Court on case No. 09AP-644/104-GK of 31 January 2005 regarding the exaction of the basic debt and interest on a loan agreement

This case is of practical interest, insofar as the subject of consideration by the courts were issues of the validity of cession of demand rights prior to the expiry of the term of the obligation.
29.03.2005

In a hearing on 17.03.2005, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dismissed the cassational complaint filed by CJSC “Trodat – S.N.G.” and LLC “Trodat XXI” against the decision of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow of 06.10.2004 and

It was earlier reported that the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow satisfied the claim filed by the company Kolop Stempelerzeugung Skopek GmbH and Co. KG, AT, whose interests were represented by the attorneys of the law firm “YUST”, and bound CJSC “Trodat – S.N.G..”, LLC “Trodat XXI” and LLC “Max Stamp” to desist from violating patent rights. This case is an interesting example of the practice of consideration of disputes connected with exclusive rights to industrial sam-ples.
25.03.2005

In its Resolution of 30.11.2004, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District revoked the Resolution of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals of 06.09.2004 № 09AP-1029/04-AK and left the decision of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow of

The territorial administration of the Ministry of State Property of Russia, the “Federal Agency for Property in the City of Moscow” issued Order № 599 “On the conditions of privatization of the State Unitary Enterprise for material supply ‘Aviatekhsnab’”on 23.12.2003. This order affirmed the list of objects not subject to privatization within the body of the property complex, which includes all buildings and constructions belonging to the enterprise on rights of economic management. Moreover, the Order charged the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Aviatekhsnab” to surrender objects not subject to privatization to the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Explorer.” Consequently, the Order of the territorial administration of the Ministry of State Property “Federal Agency for Property in the City of Moscow” violated the rights of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Aviatekhsnab.”
10.12.2004

On 1-2 March, a conference on the subject of “Intellectual property – economics and the law” shall take place in Moscow with the participation of the law firm “YUST”

The conference is organized by the company “Infor-media Russia” , a joint venture of the companies “Expomedia Group Plc” and “T&F Informa Group PLC”, who specialize in conducting conferences and organizing professional interaction. The law firm “YUST” is a co-organizer of this conference, and its specialists shall participate in the proceedings.
10.12.2004

In its Resolution of 06.08.2004, the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals upheld the decision of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow of 31.05.2004concerning the refusal of the Inspection of the Ministry of the Russian Federation of Taxes and Collect

The Inspection of the Ministry of the Russian Federation of Taxes and Collections № 29 on Closed Joint-Stock Companies applied to the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow with a request for the declaration of a transaction as invalid – an agreement of 05.08.2002 on the supply of medical equipment, executed between LLC “Aval-2000” (supplier) and LLC Enterprise “BAROST” (buyer).
07.12.2004

The Head of the Intellectual Property Department of the law firm “YUST” took part in the work of a seminar dealing with the problems of “Current issues of the legal protection of industrial property”

The seminar devoted to the problems concerning “Current issues of the legal protection of industrial property” was organized by the Russian State Institute of Intellectual Property and has occurred over the past several years. It is attended by the managers of patent services, patent specialists and patent attorneys.
24.11.2004