Media

In its Resolution of 26.10.2004, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dismissed the cassational complaint of OJSC “RZhD”, leaving in force the Resolution of the arbitration court of the appeals instance obliging OJSC “RZhD” to reinstate the entry regarding the presence of the sum of 162 381 243 rubles 60 kopecks on the personal account of OJSC “Troitskaya GRES” in the technological center for processing of documentation (TekhPD).

On 20 October 2004, the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals confirmed the illegality of yet another decision of the Commission of the Ministry for Antimonopoly Policy of 11 February 2004 on the matter of bringing OJSC “Edinaya torgovaya kompaniya” [Sole Trading Company] to book on charges of violating antimonopoly legislation.

On 23 September 2004, the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow ruled on the matter of the claim filed by the company Kolop Stempelerzeugung Skopek GmbH and Co. KG, AT against CJSC “Trodat- S.N.G.”, LLC “Trodat XXI” and LLC “MaxStamp” regarding violation of a patent. The case is of interest in the sphere of protection of intellectual property rights.

At a hearing on 14 October 2004, in which the attorneys of the law firm “YUST” took part, the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals confirmed the illegality of the Decision and Prescription of the Commission of the Ministry for Antimonopoly Policy of 11 February 2004 regarding bringing the company “Edinaya torgovaya kompaniya” to book on charges of violating antimonopoly legislation.

LLC “Bigeo” applied to the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow with a demand that the court declare invalid the registration certificate issued to LLC “Fitolon-Nauka” by the Russian Ministry of Health for the biologically-active additive “Klamin”. LLC “Fitolon-Nauka” figured in the case as a third party, and its interests were represented by the Law firm “YUST.”

On 22 April 2004, the Savelovsky District Court of the City of Moscow heard the case of I.Yu. Azizova v. LLC “Aviaexpress-Service” concerning the termination of a contract and payment of compensation for losses incurred. This case is of interest both from the legal point of view and that of everyday experience.

The Law Firm "YUST" has created a Department on Intellectual Property, aimed at offering a broad spectrum of services in this sphere.

Lawyers of the Law Firm "YUST" successfully protected the interests of the Monetka supermarket chain in court.