Media

Representatives of companies in such spheres as computer programming, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, foodstuffs, perfumery and cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, as well as representatives of bodies of executive, legislative and judicial power, companies offering legal services in the area of intellectual property, took an active part in the conference.

This case is of practical interest, insofar as the subject of consideration by the courts were issues of the validity of cession of demand rights prior to the expiry of the term of the obligation.

It was earlier reported that the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow satisfied the claim filed by the company Kolop Stempelerzeugung Skopek GmbH and Co. KG, AT, whose interests were represented by the attorneys of the law firm “YUST”, and bound CJSC “Trodat – S.N.G..”, LLC “Trodat XXI” and LLC “Max Stamp” to desist from violating patent rights. This case is an interesting example of the practice of consideration of disputes connected with exclusive rights to industrial sam-ples.

The territorial administration of the Ministry of State Property of Russia, the “Federal Agency for Property in the City of Moscow” issued Order № 599 “On the conditions of privatization of the State Unitary Enterprise for material supply ‘Aviatekhsnab’”on 23.12.2003. This order affirmed the list of objects not subject to privatization within the body of the property complex, which includes all buildings and constructions belonging to the enterprise on rights of economic management. Moreover, the Order charged the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Aviatekhsnab” to surrender objects not subject to privatization to the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Explorer.” Consequently, the Order of the territorial administration of the Ministry of State Property “Federal Agency for Property in the City of Moscow” violated the rights of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Aviatekhsnab.”

The conference is organized by the company “Infor-media Russia” , a joint venture of the companies “Expomedia Group Plc” and “T&F Informa Group PLC”, who specialize in conducting conferences and organizing professional interaction. The law firm “YUST” is a co-organizer of this conference, and its specialists shall participate in the proceedings.

The Inspection of the Ministry of the Russian Federation of Taxes and Collections № 29 on Closed Joint-Stock Companies applied to the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow with a request for the declaration of a transaction as invalid – an agreement of 05.08.2002 on the supply of medical equipment, executed between LLC “Aval-2000” (supplier) and LLC Enterprise “BAROST” (buyer).

The seminar devoted to the problems concerning “Current issues of the legal protection of industrial property” was organized by the Russian State Institute of Intellectual Property and has occurred over the past several years. It is attended by the managers of patent services, patent specialists and patent attorneys.

The Inter-Regional Inspection of the Russian Federation on Taxes and Collections from Major Taxpayers № 2 (MIMNS from MT) №2 conducted an assizes session to verify the correct calculation, fullness and timeliness of VAT payment into the state budget by LLC “Gazkomplektimpex” for the period from 01.01.2000 to 31.12.2002.

OJSC “SNP “Nova” filed a claim against OJSC “Rosno” with the Arbitration Court of the Samara Region calling for restitution of an insurance sum and interest for the use of another party’s financial means by the insurance company.

In its Resolution of 26.10.2004, the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dismissed the cassational complaint of OJSC “RZhD”, leaving in force the Resolution of the arbitration court of the appeals instance obliging OJSC “RZhD” to reinstate the entry regarding the presence of the sum of 162 381 243 rubles 60 kopecks on the personal account of OJSC “Troitskaya GRES” in the technological center for processing of documentation (TekhPD).